How could an informal reading inventory support you with providing instruction in your classroom?
Informal Reading Inventories (IRI) includes: graded passages, comprehension questions, retelling, and grade level word lists. This allows the teacher to determine the instructional reading level of each student.
An IRI helps the teacher determine what lexile level to print or assign reading passages to the students. Research shows that students need to be pushed beyond their lexile levels and exposed to higher levels of reading - but not to overwhelm or cause the student to shut down. I feel, as a teacher of struggling readers, the kids who read on lower levels are getting the grade level material in math, science, and social studies. If language arts modifies the assignments for lexile level, it will encourage the students to read more since they are comprehending more. I know some science and social studies articles are given to students on lower lexile levels but rarely are the completely individualized. So, I feel like they are being challenged a good portion of the school day.
What readability level do you think your students are receiving in your classroom? Should you make any adjustments?
Independent level: The highest a child can read without assistance (98% accuracy or 90% comprehension).
Instructional level: The highest level a child could benefit from instructional support. The “sweet spot” of teaching a student something new (90% accuracy and at least 77 - 88% comprehension).
Frustrational level: Any level the student is frustrated, even with instructional support (90% or lower oral accuracy and 70% or lower comprehension).
Miscue: Something the student reads in the passage that isn’t there.
My students this year are in a range from non-reader to reading 2 grade levels below. I am teaching sixth grade. The range is exceptional.
I have a non-reader whose Frustrational Reading Level is at kindergarten sight words level. My second lowest reader is on a first grade level and this is her independent level. Grade level material is definitely beyond frustrational level for these two students.
I have two more students whose independent levels are at 2nd-3rd grade and the rest of my group had an independent reading level of fourth grade. The higher level group’s instructional level is sixth grade. These kids have collaborative services for language arts. The lower group has an inclusion class and a separate small group resource class.
QUALITATIVE READING INVENTORY - 5 (QRI-5) INFORMATION & REFLECTION:
The QRI-5 is:
Individually administered
Informal Reading Inventory (IRI)
Word identification and comprehension
Results can show:
Approximate reading level
How to group students for guided reading
What books are appropriate for literary circles, reading workshops, and independent reading
Information for designing and evaluating intervention instruction
Student growth
Use of the passages can:
Determine a student’s independent, instructional, or frustrational levels
Independent: The student can read successfully at this level without assistance.
Instructional: The student can read with assistance from a teacher.
Frustrational: The student is completely unable to read the material with adequate word identification or comprehension. Just getting personal… but my son is in the first grade and his frustrational level is kindergarten sight words. It’s a struggle. At school, at home. I work with struggling readers all day long and when I get home, I now have one there too. My daughter was reading chapter books by the first grade. It’s so hard as a mom not to compare the two kids. At school - as a teacher - I don’t even think of comparing two kids. Each child is unique I preach! But then it gets personal.
Assess ability to read different types of texts and read in different modes: oral and silent
Measures of comprehension:
Retelling - The student is asked to retell the passage after reading it. We use DIBELS in the elementary ages. I haven’t done it as frequently as a regular education teacher but I have done it enough to know that the “retell” on DIBELS is very subjective. Maybe I would give the student a higher or lower score than another teacher. I have never been in favor of the retell portion on DIBELS. The QRI-5 says it is scored from a “map of important idea units contained in the passage.” Narrative: setting/background, goal, events, and resolution. Expository: main ideas and supporting details. I feel like for it not to be subjective, there should be a rubric or something similar for each student and have every teacher use it.
Questions - The student is asked two types of questions: text-explicit questions and text-implicit (making inferences) questions. Again, as long as there are questions and correct answers provided to all teachers, it is fair for students and I really like that they are asking both types of questions.
Look-backs - Grades 3-12 students can be asked to look back in the text to locate missing information or to correct erroneous answers. Now this. This is a skill that ALL STUDENTS should learn! It’s everything to answering comprehension questions on daily assignments, class tests, and standardized tests.
Think-alouds - Grades 6-12 students can be asked to think aloud while reading. What does that even mean? It’s actually neat now that I have read about the QRI-5. So, the student reads until getting to the word, “STOP” and then the examiner asks the student what he or she is thinking at that point. A think-aloud scoring grid is provided to help examiners keep track of they type of comments made by the reader. I LOVE this!





